Updated video link.

This commit is contained in:
Emiliana 2024-06-01 00:17:08 +02:00 • committed by GitHub
parent ccbcae05c0
commit 2b3225f599
No known key found for this signature in database
GPG key ID: B5690EEEBB952194

View file

@ -18,7 +18,7 @@ Since the landmarks used by OpenSeeFace are a bit different from those used by o
From general observation, OpenSeeFace performs well in adverse conditions (low light, high noise, low resolution) and keeps tracking faces through a very wide range of head poses with relatively high stability of landmark positions. Compared to MediaPipe, OpenSeeFace landmarks remain more stable in challenging conditions and it accurately represents a wider range of mouth poses. However, tracking of the eye region can be less accurate.
I ran OpenSeeFace on a sample clip from the video presentation for [3D Face Reconstruction with Dense Landmarks](https://microsoft.github.io/DenseLandmarks/) by Wood et al. to compare it to MediaPipe and their approach. You can watch the result [here](https://cdn.discordapp.com/attachments/720652345540870237/1016320201807106118/OSFMediaPipe3DFR.mp4).
I ran OpenSeeFace on a sample clip from the video presentation for [3D Face Reconstruction with Dense Landmarks](https://microsoft.github.io/DenseLandmarks/) by Wood et al. to compare it to MediaPipe and their approach. You can watch the result [here](https://www.vseeface.icu/assets/media/OSFMediaPipe3DFR.mp4).
# Usage