Added informal comparison to 3DDFA_V2.
This commit is contained in:
parent
0d61b061a3
commit
415f0975c9
3 changed files with 4 additions and 0 deletions
BIN
Images/3DDFA_V2.jpg
Normal file
BIN
Images/3DDFA_V2.jpg
Normal file
Binary file not shown.
|
After Width: | Height: | Size: 1.2 MiB |
BIN
Images/3DDFA_V2_800.jpg
Normal file
BIN
Images/3DDFA_V2_800.jpg
Normal file
Binary file not shown.
|
After Width: | Height: | Size: 371 KiB |
|
|
@ -103,6 +103,10 @@ Pytorch weights for use with `model.py` can be found [here](https://mega.nz/file
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
More samples: [Results3.png](https://raw.githubusercontent.com/emilianavt/OpenSeeFace/master/Images/Results3.png), [Results4.png](https://raw.githubusercontent.com/emilianavt/OpenSeeFace/master/Images/Results4.png)
|
More samples: [Results3.png](https://raw.githubusercontent.com/emilianavt/OpenSeeFace/master/Images/Results3.png), [Results4.png](https://raw.githubusercontent.com/emilianavt/OpenSeeFace/master/Images/Results4.png)
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
Here's an informal [comparison](https://raw.githubusercontent.com/emilianavt/OpenSeeFace/master/Images/3DDFA_V2.png) with [3DDFA_V2](https://github.com/cleardusk/3DDFA_V2) on five arbitrary, non-cherry picked examples from my test data:
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|

|
||||||
|
|
||||||
## Face detection
|
## Face detection
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
The landmark model is quite robust with respect to the size and orientation of the faces, so the custom face detection model gets away with rougher bounding boxes than other approaches. It has a favorable speed to accuracy ratio for the purposes of this project.
|
The landmark model is quite robust with respect to the size and orientation of the faces, so the custom face detection model gets away with rougher bounding boxes than other approaches. It has a favorable speed to accuracy ratio for the purposes of this project.
|
||||||
|
|
|
||||||
Loading…
Add table
Add a link
Reference in a new issue